CO129-576-3 Geological Survey of Hong Kong by officers of the University of British Columbia 11-12-1939 - 9-2-1940 — Page 3

3

missing, lowwer, and the question is whither further exfered. in the neighbourhood of $750 is justified to crable the missing section to be

write up.

Apparently it is not possible to decide

as to the potential value of the missing section an

من

the evidence

ཨི

the rest

q

the report. One world

howe

mppose that one

of the

principal attractions of

"Surveys. I

subhase.

домо

a survey of this nature is the possible discovery valuable minerals, and from the purely

matinal pomit

of

a

view, I should say

that the

report on the grological murvey is likely to

be a somewhat 'barren' document unless

it includes something about the mineral possibilities.

for the present, we had better await

the typescript report which is now on

iš

way;

in all the cres, and having regard to the

comparatively small addl. cost involved, a dear case for telling" the "for.

in due course, Alex Mr Bo

to

bret

до

ahead?

(hr. Robinson showed me this file

in case

lue

may

have any disors).

Melville

>

marcell

30/12/39.

Mr Kershaw, who reported.

on the Mining situ-

(1) on 53972/39] ation or latch in Sept. 1935, wrote: -

in

"3.

It is unfortunate that the... Survey

not been completed

has

or any report received, which

would give some indication of the mining poter-

The Col. The early completion of this

[Surtrey

tialitée

아